• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good thing the Tesla board voted to give Elmo all those billions to make him stay, because for a second there was an actual risk that Tesla could survive as a company without Elmo, but now they kept him and made sure they’ll all go down off that cliff.

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    How tf does someone with a bajillion dollars look like a pile of wet garbage bags at 54? Aren’t they all supposed to be using lotions made from aardvark assholes and incubus foreskins to maintain immortality?

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Both cars support oppressive dictators, but one is cheaper, supports CarPlay / Android auto, and has actually buttons for things.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I am not sure you can say BYD supports a dictator per se, more like it exists in a state capitalist country where you exist at the behest of the dictator.

      Elon actively pushed and spent money to get trump elected.

    • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is what I hate. One is owned by a fuck cunt. The other is owned by china. Neither one are actually good options if you are not buying one because of their beliefs

      • Patch@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Other options exist; you don’t have to buy either. Volkswagen Group, Audi, Renault, BMW, Fiat etc all make EVs in Europe. Hyundai & Kia also both make excellent EVs.

        Buying a Tesla is a choice these days. Nobody trips and falls into Tesla ownership. And although those cheap Chinese manufacturers look mighty tempting, they’re not the only alternative out there.

          • Derpgon@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            On a side note, Audi and VW are both under the same owner.

            Why are German cars a bad choice? I’d rather buy German than get another Citroen tbh.

            • uzay@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well, Germany is still actively supporting a genocide, and their car industry is probably supplying a not-insignificant amount of funds for that.

              • Derpgon@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                So does a lot of countries, and I am not sure if a car company has anything to do with decisions of politicians.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pooh bear is actually starting to look less oppressive in comparison these last 7 months tbh

      • Jesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be fair, the CCP has already done a lot of armed crackdowns and disappearing. They’re in the phase where people are too scared to resist.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Also quite true. They no longer need to use the threat of violence because of the implication

        • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          They’re in the phase where people are too scared to resist

          Source?

          • dude@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Over 90% of Chinese agree that “democracy is important” and 80% agree that their country is democratic? Was this survey conducted in Taiwan and signed as “China” complying with “one China policy”?

            I’ve never met any Chinese believing that their country is democratic nor that democracy is important. Quite the opposite - they usually say that China grew thanks to the lack of democracy (never calling it a dictatorship though)

            Even the CCP propaganda doesn’t claim that China is the democracy but instead they show the negative sides of the democracies so that people don’t even think that it may be a good idea if China was democratic

            • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Again, asking for any type of source or statistic over anecdotes. Your “observations” go against reputable polling and statistics of people in China.

              Was this survey conducted in Taiwan and signed as “China” complying with “one China policy”?

              No… in fact this was a Harvard study that started off with “Given how China is an authoritarian nightmare, how widespread is support for the government?”

              https://rajawali.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/final_policy_brief_7.6.2020.pdf

              • dude@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Well, I must have been super unlucky then as I have talked about it with like 5 different Chinese met at 5 different circumstances

                • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yes… that is not only possible, but likely when n=5…

                  Please, the original claim was “Chinese people feel coerced”, which is wrong by every metric, and there is no evidence to support this claim.

                  Although China is certainly not immune from severe social and economic challenges, there is little evidence to support the idea that the CCP is losing legitima- cy in the eyes of its people. In fact, our survey shows that, across a wide variety of metrics, by 2016 the Chi- nese government was more popular than at any point during the previous two decades. On average, Chinese citizens reported that the government’s provision of healthcare, welfare, and other essential public services was far better and more equitable than when the survey began in 2003. Also, in terms of corruption, the drop in satisfaction between 2009 and 2011 was complete- ly erased, and the public appeared generally support- ive of Xi Jinping’s widely-publicized anti-corruption campaign. Even on the issue of the environment, where many citizens expressed dissatisfaction, the majority of respondents expected conditions to improve over the next several years. For each of these issues, China’s poorer, non-coastal residents expressed equal (if not even greater) confidence in the actions of government than more privileged residents. As such, there was no real sign of burgeoning discontent among China’s main demographic groups, casting doubt on the idea that the country was facing a crisis of political legitimacy.

                  https://rajawali.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/final_policy_brief_7.6.2020.pdf

                  Let me guess: Harvard is tankie?

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        The fact that you can freely criticize and say whatever you want about Elon means that he is not even close to as oppressive.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You are free to say anything that doesn’t draw the ire of cops, politician, or immigration agents. Otherwise, you might get the shit kicked out of you, thrown in prison on bs charges, or deported/denied entry.

          Only those who don’t move dont notice their chains.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      nah, forget about them

      let us have economical cars because we don’t need these massive expensive things just to go 5km to get a load of groceries

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Let us have safe bicycle infrastructure do that we can bike to those stores, how about that? And with that, add mixed constructions in the suburbs so that people have small local stores around.

        A bike costs a fraction of a car

        Bicycle infrastructure building and maintenance costs a fraction of that for cars

        Bicycles don’t emit CO2. And for those wise asses saying that the cyclist does, it’s a fraction of a fraction of a car because you’re not lugging 2 tonnes of stell around to transport you and a bottle of milk.

        Cycling infrastructure is much more efficient, you can push a shit tonne more people over the same road if you don’t need big ass cars. Yes, even your Mercedes smart car is I ass compared to a bicycle

        It creates much much less pollution from tire dust

        It’s much safer, bicycles kill only a fraction of the people that cars kill all year round

        It’s healthier, people do exercise not because they went to the gym, but all day every day with their bikes

        It cuts the noise pollution

        It’s cheaper because no taxes, no gas needed, maintenance is a fraction of that of a car.

        It’s way less wasteful

        It lowers aggression. Though it may or may not exist, I’ve never heard of bicycle road rage

        Need more?

        Less cars is less parking spaces. Parking spaces get cities barely any taxable income. Instead of these ugly ass concrete wasteland parkitsoaces you can now have restaurants with outside patios which can be taxed. Couple that with the cheaper infrastructure, and that alone should be an obvious reason as to why do this

        It’s really not that much slower. For typical short trips, bicycles usually only add some 10-20% of required time to your trip.

        For any trip over say, 5-10 kilometers, use good public transportation

        For those once in a lifetime trips where you actually need a car because you need to transport something huge, use one of those Evo rent-a-car.

        In the Netherlands, a huge amount of people don’t have a car. Not because they can’t (they totally can) but because it’s stupid to have one. You can go everywhere by bike, you can jump with your bike in a train when needed to go further, cars are expensive and bad for everyone, why even have one?

        • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree with all of this and personally I have replaced as many car trips as I can with a bicycle

          however I also recognize that that’s simply too far for most people right now, at least in my area. people love their cars. I would just love it if they weren’t so damn dangerous and offensive, and I wasn’t nearly killed every time I go out and they come near me. that’s literally a 50/50 chance when I bike to the grocery store that somebody nearly kills me (actually in the past 3 weeks that ratio is a little bit safer, but history shows that I’ll have a bunch of things happen in a short time to bring it back to even).

          first we need people to recognize that they don’t need massive vehicles. then an extension of that logic is that they don’t need a motor vehicle for a lot of things.

        • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That works in the city but i live in a remote area, and have an hour and a half round trip to work every day because its not economically viable for me to move closer.

          Since I doubt Canada/BC will spend the money putting in viable public transit/high speed rail, I just want them to do the bare minimum to allow me to afford to stop burning gas to afford my next meal.

          While striving for turning every small town into a walkable city sounds great and amazing on paper, the reality is it won’t happen, so we should push for baby steps in the right direction instead only focusing on the absolute ideal.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re saying “this solution won’t work for me so nobody should have it”. Try instead “good that it works for you, but I need XYZ so we can tackle the problem on both fronts.”

            • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s… Not at all what I am saying.

              Go read the rest of the thread, where I agree the ideal is great, but we should be taking realistic steps towards it, instead of an unrealistic, all or nothing attitude that doesn’t take rural Canadians into consideration.

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            stuff like this is why I want to focus on the wide, sweeping generalization of “smaller vehicle is better”

            there’s no need for someone in your position to drive a massive crossover for your commute in case you need to pick up 30 lb of groceries after work. you can do that with a hatchback, and pretty much the biggest reason that people don’t choose to do it with a hatchback is that they’re afraid of the bigger heavier vehicles on the road

            I still push bicycle infrastructure, but I’m not going to push for everybody to get on bikes. I’m going to push for everybody to stop having such goddamn offensive dangerous vehicles (yes please drive at me at 90 km/h with blinding headlights in a 4,000 lb vehicle with a hood that is above my eye level when I’m in a vehicle with 8 in of ground clearance), and try to get them to realize that no it’s not okay because it came that way, you bought it and you have a responsibility as the owner and driver

            • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              And I don’t drive a large crossover, I drive an escape phev, carpool with 2 other people, and use it for more than just ‘30 pounds of groceries’.

              I have filled it to the brim and gone camping multiple times this year, use it to transport my recycling to the transfer station every couple months, and at least twice a year do a large grocery shop at the Costco 4 hours away, stuffing it as full as I can manage.

              I regularly use it to transport things that wouldn’t fit in a vehicle smaller than this one. Hell, I managed to stuff my stove in the thing, though only just barely.

              For my daily commute, since I charge it both at home and at work, I only burn 3-4L of gas, which I would say is quite good for nearly 150km.

              The only way for my daily/weekly/monthly/yearly routine to be more eco friendly is if I could afford to trade it in for a full electric vehicle - and with the trips I do on a regular basis (including camping, day trips to the ‘nearby’ lakes, occasional work driving), I would need something with a range above 600km, preferably 700km to be safe in the winter. Otherwise I would have to maintain 2 vehicles - one an electric with a range of at least 200km and the other a small truck or mid sized SUV, and that kind of defeats the entire purpose.

              • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                right, like you’re using your vehicle appropriately for its capabilities. people seem to think that they need to use it at 10% of its capabilities

                • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  10%? Try 1%… For every 1 of me in this area there are literally 10 lifted king cab shortboxes that never get used for truck purposes on the highway for the same commute as me.

                  The excuse is always “but I need it if I go offroad or want to tow my boat/camper to the lake!” as if they do that more than once a year.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t think Musk much cares or ever did. The goal was to milk tesla for every last dime.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t get how a company is losing this much in multiple countries yet is still operating?

    Like if they can lose this much and still be operating and investments not tanking, would it follow that they can pay better wages and benefits?

    • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Last I checked years ago, they sold their carbon credits for a whole lot of money whenever they earned them.

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah Tesla only incidentally makes cars. Their accrual business is being a Carbon Credits dealer. Which just goes to show that the whole concept of carbon credits is nonsense. Climate change can’t be solved by market mechanisms

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The US is corrupt enough at this point the only thing massive corporations have to do to survive is be massive.

      Many companies that never even have turned a consistent profit are major players in the US economy.

      The idea of valuing actual market competition is a distraction conservatives point to as a cool aesthetic and it has little to do with the economic reality of the US. So long as the right people are in power a dictatorship is totally acceptable to conservatives by and large and the inevitable end result of that as we are seeing are stunning displays of incompetency at the highest levels of power.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I wonder if a large part of this as well is strictly because BYD is priced cheaper. I know for me personally 90 percent of the reason I haven’t invested in electric is because they’re all still luxury priced.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know about you but I drive over 5-10km regularly. For a short miserable stretch my daily commute was 90 miles. Buying household groceries or anything of size sounds annoying or impossible on bike. And then there’s work tools and whatnot that many professionals keep in vehicle.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m completely out of shape and don’t exercise at all, but commuted to work on a bike when my workplace was ~5 miles away. Wasn’t hard at all and only took a little longer than a car. Had a rack on the back and bags to pick up groceries too. If you need carry a lot of heavy tools every day, it obviously wouldn’t be ideal. Even then a bicycle trailer could be used up to something like 100lbs.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The ebike option meme is so laughable. I recently did some research on cargo bikes and the entry models cost as much as a used ICE car with no air con, no rain cover, no heating, no safety. Ebike people are straight up delusional in thinking this is ready to replace cars.

      Getting a second hand ice car is objectively the best thing you can do right now for everyone involved unless you ride half a million km a year.

      • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Ok? I bought my E-Bike 8 years ago for 1500€ and use two roller bags and grab a bit of groceries on my way back from work. It’s a 10km commute one way, so a total of 20km. It takes me a grand total of 26 minutes to get to work. The car usually takes longer due to traffic.

        I mean, it’s nice having a PHEV for bigger tasks but we (family of 3) only have one car. We do plenty with our E-Bikes.

        Edit: and yes, I use the bike in winter, during rain and snow and I don’t give a shit. I fortunately also don’t live in a total shit hole, which was a choice I actively made.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’m happy you have this privilidge but reality is majority of the world doesn’t. E-bikes are still not accessible to most and that’ll continue to be the way because the tech is fundamentally flawed without fundamental architecture redesign which will take decades at least.

          • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The tech is flawed? Bicycles are the most efficient mode of transportation bar none. E-Bikes just have a very efficient motor slapped onto them. It’s not the tech. I also don’t believe it’s the climate because I know for a fact that more and more people are commuting by bike in the Philippines. If they can do it in 37 °C heat at 99% humidity and maximum exhaust fumes, then so can you.

            That said, infrastructure is the biggest flaw. And that’s something that can be changed within a couple of years, as long as people are willing to do so. The Netherlands were a car-brain shit hole in the 70s, and they made a 180 and live in fucking paradise.

            Of course there are many things that absolutely require a car, but groceries isn’t one of those, unless you live in the soulless suburban sprawl that you see so often in the USA.

            • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The tech is flawed? Bicycles are the most efficient mode of transportation bar none

              Efficient in what regard? it has 0% efficiency when it comes to covering me from rain or the sun. Now what?

              • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                That’s what clothes are for? Don’t fault the tech if you don’t know how to use it.

      • bassad@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t think it is laughable.

        A new cargo is 5000€ and you can find used or discounted ones for less than 3000€.

        A used car will cost far more in repairs, insurance and gas, my 2010 car is valued around 3000€ and it costs us around 1000-1500€/year.

        I don’t think bikes can replace cars for everyone, but many people could use a bike instead or their car 95% of the time, when we see that so much people use a car for less than 5 km.

        Only concern is safety to use a bike in the middle of fast cars, but a proper infrastructure (separated bike lanes) solves it for a fraction of the cost of roads and parking places.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re just pulling stats out of your ass here. What you’re doing with your cargo bike in winter? Or summer heat? The cargo bike cult really thinks most of the world is a small town in central Europe when most of the world on avg is mountains in Indonesia.

          I swear the sole reason e-bikes are not as big as they should be is the obnoxiously ignorant user base.

          • bassad@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            uuuh in winter we have things like cloths, even warmed gloves and boots when really cold ? Go in Montreal to figure it out, some are biking there even in winter.

            I am pulling stats out of my close area, national stats are : For distances of less than 5 kilometers, cars still account for 60% of commutes. Less than 5 km can you imagine ?

            Just put your ass on a bike instead of your fingers, and just try to do things

          • bassad@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes it is.

            Because it is handcraft compared to car industry (85 millions/year), and not subsidized at all.

            Now how much costs a car ? Not only the price, but globally, if you include health impact, infrastructure needs.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m genuinely surprised people be ok with BYD on Lemmy. It’s authoritarian spyware, period. There are more options than these two - ww don’t have to choose the lesser evil.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lemmy is weird. As long as you’re on the dogpile against the current “big bad” of the week, you’re good to go. Fuck Tesla? Then let’s buy Chinese products.

      It’s insane, but it’s where we are.

      It’s authoritarian spyware, period. There are more options than these two - ww don’t have to choose the lesser evil.

      Let’s not forget that they are actively committing genocide against the Uighur. I don’t think they are the “lesser evil”.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Or still actively occupy Tibet, how conveniently everyone forgot that but yay a slightly cheaper car!

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What, do you want to bring back the theocratic, slave-owning Lamas? I haven’t been to Tibet to as them, but I really doubt the average person wants what you seem to want for them.

          • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Because Tibet never got the chance to transition to a modern country. FYI China invaded in 1950 Oct 6th - at that time big chunk of the world was still theocratic, autocratic and slave owning.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              And during the 1950s, the US trained the former slaves owners, gave them weapons, then airdropped them into Tibet to lead an uprising, they were lynched by their former slaves, but even today is still angling to install the Dali Lama as the head of state.

              If China said “yall are on your own”, do you think the US would stop doing what it is currently doing, giving money, weapons (when applicable), and diplomatic support to reactionaries who want to return to those days?

              Or do you think they would suffer an immediate economic recession without China funding their development?

              • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Country: is literally invaded
                Some dude online: but US could have invaded too in some parallel universe!

                Lmao

                • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  They werent invaded, they were liberated. They were invaded by their former masters, with US backing in the 50s.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why would someone who doesn’t live in China give a shit about Chinese spyware, especially when the alternative is any of the big US/EU manufacturers who happily hand your information to your own government?

      China can’t do shit to yall. I’d include myself in there, but I quite enjoyed my time in China and intend to return, so Chinese spyware could actually be a threat to me.

      • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Even ignoring that horrendously simple minded reason for not caring about privacy…

        You’d still support the CCP lol

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yes? They’ve lifted a billion people out of poverty, produce more green energy than the rest of the world combined, helped fight the Japanese in WWII, I might have my criticisms of the CPC, particularly regarding their lack of support for LGBT+, allowing Shanghai to fuck over zero covid until it had to be abandoned, and some really dumb laws, overall I have to support them because we’ve seen what happens when liberalism triumphs over communism. If you’re lucky, your entire populace is immiserated and you get decades of rightwing dictators robbing the populace blind, see the former USSR, If your not, anyone who isn’t right of Reagan is shot, see Korea and Indonesia.