https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/27/1088154/wifi-sensing-tracking-movements/

WiFi-based human motion detection through barriers

And got slurped up into chatgpt

Can’t believe I forgot about that. Thanks

Is this the first time they’re using active duty troops and not national guard?

The teenagers of Theseus

I replaced my entire tech stack with Postgres

At least in PG, that is explicitly not the case, unless I’m misunderstanding:

Similarly, a PL/pgSQL loop of the form FOR x IN query LOOP … END LOOP will never use a parallel plan, because the parallel query system is unable to verify that the code in the loop is safe to execute while parallel query is active.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/when-can-parallel-query-be-used.html

At any rate, I feel like it’s questionable design to have a user making row-by-row decisions on hard deletes.

You can just insert directly to the helper/audit table, and delete using it, no need for the cursor loop. If you need a handle to go through the records one by one, something else has already gone wrong.