So, how much money do you think Matt and Trey are going to sue them for?

  • TawdryPorker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    Just FYI, the CEO of Fable Studios is one Edward Saatchi. His father is Maurice Saatchi whose advertising agency was partially responsible for ten years of Conservative rule under Margaret Thatcher. The family absolutely has previous with union bashing.

  • Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    Just watched it. Writers have nothing to worry about for now. I do admit I laughed once, though.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      You are making the same mistake I see a lot of people make when it comes to AI, which is looking at the status quo as a snapshot rather than a change over time.

      The last widely reported on AI generated ‘show’ was the Seinfeld one from…checks notes…a few months ago.

      The leap between what that was a few months back and this here is quite something.

      So your “right now” may be true for today, but quite possibly by as early as the end of this year there will very much be something to worry about.

      (Though really, there still won’t be much to worry about, as the future will almost certainly be AI plus human efforts, not either or.)

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think you’re making the same mistake as people who thought self-driving cars would be here 5 years ago. You can’t just extrapolate out technological progress. The relatively easy things get solved first and relatively quickly but we may need a decade to solve some of the most challenging scenarios.

        • kromem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Self driving cars were here five years ago, which is when Waymo first had driverless cars on roads. Tesla had a wide release of FSD ‘Beta’ three years ago.

          And there’s a gulf of a difference on the speed at which hardware that has an 8 year average refresh cycle grows in a market and software that can reach a hundred million users in 3 months.

          • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            You’re right. We all love our fully self-driving cars and by 2026, chatbots will write longform narratives so beautifully, we won’t even need cars because we’ll all be transported anywhere we want to go by the magic of books.

  • Aimhere@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I remember how, years ago, an AI was asked to write a script for a Batman comic book, given a bunch of real comic issues as its learning input. The resulting script was horribly stilted, and hilarious to read. It was popular enough that an artist turned it into an actual comic book.

    Today’s AIs have come a long way.

    Edit: just out of curiosity, I asked ChatGPT to “write a Batman comic book script, with The Joker as the villain”. That’s it. No other input.

    What came out was far less stilted than the one mentioned above, but bare-bones, extremely generic, and boring. The real Batman writers have little to fear at the moment.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    SP is already really shitty animation though, so they’re setting the bar really, really low

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      We think the timing is correct — we are right in the middle of the biggest strike in 60 years, by releasing the research (but not the ability for anyone to create episodes of protected IP) we hope [for] the Guilds in Hollywood to negotiate strong, strong, strong protections that producers cannot use AI tools without the express permission of artists. Frankly the IP holders also need to figure out how to negotiate with AI chatbot companies who are profiting from their work.

      And what’s the problem here? They aren’t trying to profit off this tech here, they’re building a stronger case for the strike. Did the writers of this article read their source material?

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    False. The Hollywood strikes (plural) are not principally about AI.

    A more salient issue is that streaming TV & movie services do not pay residuals.

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I almost feel like the AI proposal was a form of ‘dead cat’ strategy; while everyone is understandably angry about AI and fixated on that, no-one is talking about the actual issue that kicked all this off (the share of residual royalty payments)

  • testuserpleaseupvote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Where’s the profanity, the swearing? AI, more like Artificially limited, that’s the only joke. Kyle not calling Cartman a fatass once, what?

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Oh no, what if they use this technology to make cartoon version of celebrities like me say things that I would never actually say?

  • thallamabond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    "Fable started in 2018 as a spinoff from Facebook’s Oculus (how times have changed since then), working on VR films — a medium that never really took off. Now it has seemingly pivoted to AI, "

    I wonder how much of the ai hype is just huge investments into hardware, looking for profits.

  • ffelix@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The video is password protected now. Did anyone get a chance to download the episode?

  • Socialphilosopher@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    When the printing press came out during the Ottoman Empire, those who wrote handwritten books started a rebellion. Today, there is no professional group that writes by handwriting. There will always be anti-AI protests. But if a technology has emerged that makes a job cheaper and faster, you can’t avoid it. I recommend that you eliminate the professions that will disappear when directing professions for your children.

    • Krzak@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      In a world where you must work, making jobs disappear is a death sentence. And don’t you start babbling about “new jobs being made”. There’s no guarantee they’ll pay as much and be as available as the ones lost. AI is not a thing to look forward to, judgning by how it’s used. It probably could’ve been used for good but tech millionaires aren’t good people.

      • tallwookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        automation is going to happen though, it’s far to cost effective to avoid.

        businesses that could automate but don’t won’t be as competitive as those businesses that embrace automation. eventually they’ll disappear