• SatyrSack@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    The only downside I have seen is that GSYNC will not work. The newer display supports it, put anyone upgrading an older Framework 16 with the new NVIDIA card will have to buy the screen upgrade as well if they need GSYNC.

      • potustheplant@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        Nowadays they’re the same thing. Nvidia uses a different name because they like appropriating things, I guess.

        • tekato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          They are not the same thing. GSYNC requires the monitor to be embedded with an NVIDIA controller.

          • potustheplant@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            It does not. You’re talking about the original version GSYNC which required a hw module. That’s no longer the case.

              • potustheplant@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                13 days ago

                “g-sync compatible” monitors are still advertised as “g-sync”. So, while you’re technically right, even though nvidia’s marketing differentiates versions, manufacturers only put that in the fine print. Also, if you go back to the original question (“Will freesync work with it?”), if gsync works, freesync works as well. Regardless of which variant of gsync you have.

                Lastly, framework mentions “we’ve updated our 165Hz 2560x1600 panel to support NVIDIA G-SYNC®” but I’m not sure they’re referring to actually including a coprocessor. It most likely refers to just adding VRR support.