• Leon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why can the president stand above the law? They’re talking a lot about having no kings or whatever but Trump basically is one.

    Sweden is a constitutional monarchy. Our king doesn’t have as much power as Trump. Neither does our prime minister.

    Neither should. That’s not how a democracy should work.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Normally, a president can’t. The president is supposed to be checked by the legislative (Congress) and judicial (Supreme Court) branches of the government (president being executive).

      The problem is, the other two are loyal to him so they don’t check each other.

      Most presidents have not had this power.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think they are talking specifically about the power of pardon, which all other presidents certainly have had.

        • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          The government has basically been held together by a system of social norms and gentleman’s agreements which Trump doesn’t give two shits about. The one, singular potential good thing that might come out of this presidency is if all of these loopholes get closed as a result.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be clear: Trump’s opponents are saying no kings. Trump & those around him are tweeting pictures and videos of him as a king. Stephen miller said Trump had “pleniary power”. His followers want him to be king.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      The whole pardon thing, as well as others of the US presidential powers, are a remainder from absolutism. They thought they took the best of all worlds, by combining elements from absolutism with more democratic elements and combined them into a constitution, when in reality it was a pretty shaky construction from the beginning. And of course now it has long since gone completely rotten by deliberate corrupting the system even more than it was before.