Oh no! What will I do now without the prescient geopolitical insight of the Chattanooga Evening Telegraph?
BrokebackHampton
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
Big time mirin. She loves her human
BrokebackHampton@kbin.socialto Technology@lemmy.world•“AI took my job, literally”—Gizmodo fires Spanish staff amid switch to AI translator111·2 years agoI want to get off Mr. Bones’ Wild Venture Capitalist Ride
BrokebackHampton@kbin.socialto Technology@lemmy.world•Someone is trying to log in to my account from WINDOWS 7!!!11·2 years agodeleted by creator
BrokebackHampton@kbin.socialto World News@lemmy.world•Young climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stance12·2 years agoThat is factually false information. There are solid arguments to be made against nuclear energy.
https://isreview.org/issue/77/case-against-nuclear-power/index.html
Even if you discard everything else, this section seems particularly relevant:
The long lead times for construction that invalidate nuclear power as a way of mitigating climate change was a point recognized in 2009 by the body whose mission is to promote the use of nuclear power, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). “Nuclear power is not a near-term solution to the challenge of climate change,” writes Sharon Squassoni in the IAEA bulletin. “The need to immediately and dramatically reduce carbon emissions calls for approaches that can be implemented more quickly than building nuclear reactors.”
https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-is-nuclear-energy-good-for-the-climate/a-59853315
Wealer from Berlin’s Technical University, along with numerous other energy experts, sees takes a different view.
“The contribution of nuclear energy is viewed too optimistically,” he said. “In reality, [power plant] construction times are too long and the costs too high to have a noticeable effect on climate change. It takes too long for nuclear energy to become available.”
Mycle Schneider, author of the World Nuclear Industry Status Report, agrees.
“Nuclear power plants are about four times as expensive as wind or solar, and take five times as long to build,” he said. “When you factor it all in, you’re looking at 15-to-20 years of lead time for a new nuclear plant.”
He pointed out that the world needed to get greenhouse gases under control within a decade. “And in the next 10 years, nuclear power won’t be able to make a significant contribution,” added Schneider.
deleted by creator
Microsoft is generally not as bad with this kind of stuff anymore
FTFY. 90s Microsoft would’ve sent some thugs
BrokebackHampton@kbin.socialto Games@lemmy.world•ZeroSpace look like a good StarCraft2 spiritual successor7·2 years agoAnd it already looked lifeless back in 2006
We call our cat “the big salami” when he adopts his tubular stance
And why is he trusted? I sure as fuck don’t trust him
“The viet cong have infiltrated our tunnels. Deploy the agent orange”
I bet Mr. DeMille will be pleased with these shots
It says so right in the name though:
Him-a-lyin
City builder with no combat is right up my alley, so I thought Against the Storm was absolutely brilliant. A much needed fresh take on the genre.
I’m also looking forward to Steamworld Build. I’ve loved the Anno series since I was a child and I love most of the games in the Steamworld series, so this combination is shaping up to make for an amazing game. I tried the demo a little bit and it looked so well designed and polished.
deleted by creator