• 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle



  • Selon les anglais:

    • Protéger le français c’est de la xénophobie.

    • Si la culture francophone ne survie pas de ses propres mérites (e.g: sans loi), elle ne mérite pas d’être préservée.

    • Parler en anglais partout, au travaille, en publique, dès qu’il y a un anglo à porté ce n’est pas suffisant. Faudrait qu’absolument tous les services soient disponibles en anglais. Parce ce que…

    • C’est innaceptable pour un anglophone qu’un petit bout de terre sur le continent ne respecte pas leur privilège. Les francophones qu’ils n’ont nul part d’autre à aller qu’ils aillent chier, on va quand même pas apprendre à parler deux langues.

    Si le Québec se fait assimiler, c’est finis pour toujours le Français en Amérique. Mais c’est étrangement compliqué pour les anglais de comprendre la situation un peu unique du Québec, étant encerclé par littéralement une seule langue. Mais après, quand je vois comment ils traitent n’importe qui d’autre ne parlant pas anglais, je comprend que ce n’est pas unique à comment ils traitent le Québec.

    Désolé pour les fautes, ça fait des années que ma vie est an anglais ici. La dernière fois ou j’ai pu parler et écrire en français au travaille c’était en 2020 avant qu’un employé anglophone rejoigne mon équipe. Speak white!








  • We did something similar with our APIs. It broke every conventions and expectations of the product and the language, and of course didn’t follow any logical good practices. Man did the boss love to tell me users had to read the doc anyway so we might just as well do whatever. Then later on when issues arose and I suggested making better APIs I was hit by some dull remark about how we shouldn’t violate the principle of least-surprise by going a different direction. Bitch are you kidding me? You broke that very principe in the first place by making grotesquely alien APIs.




  • Congress has the power to declare war. The president being commander-in-chief does not mean he can do whatever he please with the U.S army as its own personal force. The president is meant to follow the constitution, even as commander. If the president ignores treaties and war declarations, I would argue the president is the one violating the separation of powers, and not congress by hypothetically enforcing the powers given to them by the constitution. By this logic, whoever controller the army should have absolute power, being commander-in-chief and all. I like how you slipped past my initial post by completely ignoring that the constitution grants congress influence over foreign policies by citing the president control over the armed forces as this unalienable right. Why have treaties then? Why have declaration of war? I think you might be slightly biased in your argument. The president was never the sole responsible for foreign policies, even though the executive branch had a lot of influence over those in recent times.





  • Elderos@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlLies! Deception!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I have seen a doc about Home Depot (not the pictured store) some time ago. Apparently the overstocked facade was a big deal because those big stores want you to think they have everything that can possibly exist in their inventory so you only always go there and make no further stops.

    Of course, it’s smoke and mirror and a lot of stores adopted the big warehouse style for the same reasons. Some stores have legit empty boxes filled with crap all over. If you ever went into one of those store looking for something very specific tho, it is pretty apparent that they only overstock a few profitable items and the rest is no better, or worse than smaller locally-owned shops inventory-wise. Only exception around here would be Costco, which is a.legit warehouse.