I find it a positive thing that the original protesters, the Gen Z club is distancing itself from the violence and destruction done by another group. Who the other group (the infiltrators ) was remains unclear.

I went and did a little digging. There are opposition parties

Tnx for your digwork. Haven’t done that myself now.

What I do remember from some older tv documentary was basically that Chinese Gvement was using local politicians for greater CCP dogma into Nepal via schoolchildren books. Locals mentioned the fear of the eradication of Nepalese culture and lenguage, iirc.

Add: found this link

" According to the Chinese embassy in Nepal, there are more than 900 Mandarin teachers in Nepal who are already teaching the language in various parts of the country. Additionally, China is also promoting its films, arts, and culture in Nepal through various means"

We must fight chat control (Europe), or this Orwellian nightmare could be our foreland. Thumbs up for Nepal and all others protesting for freedom and free Internet

I dont get the need to compare suffering. Imo you desecrate both Holacaust victims and the Palestine people in their identity, experience and pain.

Just keep it simple and call Israeli Gvement and especially Netanyahu fucking (genocidal) murderers and Fascist.

It’s really horrible… Just little kids omg.

Imagine that." The people have voted today…" Well…they’ll find out soon enough.

Also, most worldleaders aren’t as extreme, but for sure " 100% democracy proof" implant would be an insurance/ h

Which is just Russia with a paper mask

Ah, then I misunderstood your “That” reference.

Could be, but unclear. The history of what we call Fascism now is very old. Could be two parties working together or one for the other. It seems though afaik, that their agenda to dismantle democracy coincide per they both being autocratic. Do you perchance have any links w/info?

What are you talking about? Afd has direct links to Russia, FSB & China . Here some quick links.

with Russia.

and USA.

The Afd is also linked to USA ( Pete Hegseth/ Musk) and especially via the Heritage Foundation. The one which wrote Project 2025 ( or Mein Kampf edition 25).

Western troops would wipe the effing floor with the russians.

Does this mean that US will guarantee the backstop?

Overall, it seems Putin and Trump prefer to continue escalating the situation. Their rethoric mounts to something like this: " Why can’t Europe & Ukraine just behave, and do as they are told."

Seems again, both oligarchs don’t want a peaceful solution. Unfortunately, we are running out of options here.

Probably;)

Maybe somebody losing a deal or concession because the new Indonesia- Peru tradedeal?

Don’t know why you were downvoted

FYI : all comments have been downvoted. Twice to be exact. Thats not a coincidence.

That’s all very suspicious behaviour. First the whole Bush Sr admin kill Al Quaida thing, you’re either with me or against me, iirc.Then, Obama admin. torpedoes the legislature process of civilians.

Yea. I know about 9/11 and of Al Quaida ofc… Anyone (an USA Lemmian) care to provide some context?

Quote from this article :

" The Financial Times has obtained access to 29 Russian military secret files from 2013-2014 with lists of targets, particularly nuclear power plants, for a potential war with Japan and South Korea."

I read this article differently; atacks on civilian targets and energy infrastructure, while effective to completely neutralise a country, is without any consideration for the principle of proportionality, according to international humanitarian law, and is primarily a warcrime.

To me, it’s an affirmation of the idea that Russian, Chinese, and North-Korean military cooperation has been going on for much longer than some suspected. And, that such states have no regards for civilians lives and have no intentions of upholding international law.

See also Is attacking Ukraine’s power grid a war crime?, BBC; " The state has an obligation under international humanitarian law (IHL) to choose a target or a tactic that will cause less damage to civilians. Less death and less injury, but still fulfilling the military advantage," Dr Maria Varaki from King’s College War Studies department told the BBC."

Brazilian law is key?!

"BYD said it “does not tolerate disrespect for Brazilian law and human dignity” and that it had immediately terminated the contract with Jinjiang for part of the work at the factory and was considering “other appropriate measures”.

Add: found this 2023 article, concerning Jinshan Construction in Serbia.

Probably same company using different Sino- Romanized name.

The history of colonialism?

As it is stated as a (rhetorical) question, I’d say probably also due to present ( Wagner) imperialism.

I don’t know how to read this analysis. So, it starts out as a comparative analysis between the US and EU. And that’s where I get lost. Comparing a single country and then failing EU for not having( yet?) a single fiscal policy, because EU isn’t a single country, is just… non applicable (yet).

Also, their quote, about the different levels of gouvernement debt between North and South. while correct, it is also true for some US states. “An equitable fiscal union means countries should enter with similar levels of government debt. That condition is clearly not met in the eurozone, where debt stands at 40% and 60%, respectively, in the Netherlands and Germany, while it lies at 110%, 140%, and 100% in France, Italy, and Spain, respectively”

What I also miss, is the effect of the extreme rise in energy prices, which are (sort of) unique to the European situation.

Unlike the USA, the Euro isn’t a reserve currency, and we can’t print endless money, which is the US way to solve their debts

Their arguments could still be valid though. I’m just unsure how to understand their viewpoints and how to implement them.

We don’t have a fiscal union, we still have debts and they keep rising; more investments( debts?) are needed; energy, tariffs and other trade barriers cripple our import/ export balance etc .

Am no expert here, so hopefully someone can offer more insight and expertise, to shed some light .

Fiscal Union would facilitate Eurobonds according to fiscal union wiki:

" In the European Union, fiscal union has been mooted as a next step forward into deeper European integration but, as of July 2022, remains largely just a proposal. If fiscal union were to happen, national expenditure and tax rates would be set at European Council level. There would be Eurobonds instead of individual national bonds that would finance collective Euro debt."

Add: According to FT article Macron , there are several schemes to implement Eurobonds, the main but not only one, seem to be a fiscal union.