Needs more CAD

Heyday is what you mean, I think.

They are better, but you foolishly assumed that they meant better for the consumer, not better for the seller.

They are unenforceable for more reasons than that. They also can not prove that you agreed to it, only that someone did.

Also, they can’t change the terms of your previous purchase after the fact. They can make you agree to something new going forward, but if they make your current device a brick because you don’t agree (which they are doing here), then they need to reimburse you for causing the loss of use of your device that you already purchased and was working under the previous terms.

FLAC or some other lossless format is better.

It’s google, they’ll just stop working on it.

There are 2 choices so they are equally likely

There are only two options at that point. It MUST be 50-50.

The host’s intentions are irrelevant. Numerically, there are only two choices. That makes it fifty-fifty.

Now you have 2 choices: the door you chose, or the only other door left. One has a goat and one has a car. That’s fifty-fifty.

In your explanation, the door originally had a 1% chance, but after showing 98 goats, it has a 50% chance.

After you find out there’s a goat behind door #2, you have a 50% chance whether you stay on 1 or move to three. There are only two possible outcomes at that point (car or goat), so either way it’s a coin flip.

Or add 3% to the green grid

Three apps, plus still needing iTunes for podcasts. Thanks, Apple.

Bunch of jabronis

It’s easier said than done, but it’s not that difficult. It’s mostly reconfiguration of plumbing and zone controls on HVAC. The electrical is easier to distribute.

If you commit to doing it the right way, and tear it down to the structure (but leave the facade alone), it’s not terribly difficult.

The problem is that the building owners want to do it cheap, and it won’t be cheap. It will be more economical in the long run than fully vacant building though.

“old” & “late 90s” = Go straight to hell, young’un!

If it truly is only an hour of someone’s time, then I’d much rather they made that insignificant amount less profit, but did the work to make our experience better.

Yes, but actually no. They are looking NOW, because they are being forced to look. They apparently weren’t before, which is a sign of bad QA, and the scary part for the potential passengers.

I just want them to make it a KC Chiefs helmet full-time.

I keep multiple versions in the same library. I use Emby, and, as long as my naming is good, I get one listing for each movie, and the ability to select which version to watch.

You just reminded me of something I saw once, that I’d love to find. It was some sketch comedy show, and the sketch was “Every episode of Star Trek”. It was hysterical.