It’s so they are providing aid but can limit it just enough that everyone is technically able to be fed but still starve. It’s a way to look like they’re doing something good but in reality are doing something extremely cruel.

Unfortunately fusion centers are a thing, they shouldn’t be but they are.

Russia is still a bigger military, Europe didn’t pick a fight with them. Russia is definitely fucking up as usual and just throwing men and equipment at it with no particular logic involved.

They’re already involved in a way they just haven’t accepted it. No country wants to get involved but I’m sorry eventually they have to.

Yeah that’s their only smart choice. Russia may be fucking up big but in a war of attrition Ukraine will lose sooner or later.

Historically? With extreme violence, let’s hope we do better this time but I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Define woke.

Yeah, probably not a great idea on Chi-Raq. If anywhere were to put forth a united resistance it’s the place with a history of running the police or if the city with armed force.

For lolita express? Probably, we know he was one of the people who were in the letter book and he’s made statements about attending events with Epstein and young women. What’s young to a dude who openly fucks 16 yr olds?

To be fair he was often involved with the leads along with a long string of 16 and 17 yr olds.

The only way to know is if it sings in the dead of night.

That would be my story too.

They can’t in this case.

In your example they essentially used the same basis as felony murder (which I don’t agree with but whatever) in that they do not know who did pulled the trigger and made the enhancements threat but there’s no argument both were there.

In this case there’s only one person there during the shooting and that’s on video, it physically and logically could not be two people and therefore two convictions are unlikely to hold.

Automatically? No, almost nothing but enhancements are automatic.

What I hear you saying it is not just possible but probable.

Sure. But you said there isn’t a mechanism for it, there clearly is.

Reversed, released, overturned are all the same thing and happen literally daily. Where did you get your information that a conviction can’t be changed?

Ed: reading your source it hinged on the crime technically being capable of being committed by multiple people and this one clearly can’t be.

They can once they release that conviction but it goes to show ineptitude and malfeasance which casts doubt on any further attempt to convict someone. And yes it would, shadow of a doubt is a high standard and a second conviction is a huge amount of doubt.

Factual innocence is different, it’s a positive defense for literally any criminal charge.

I think that’s exactly where it’s going. Get convicted, real killer confesses and the state can’t pursue a crime they’ve convicted someone for.

I’m not a chemist or whatever but my first thought was if you routinely needed a lot of something that was safer to make and distill in small batches at a distance from each other.

Moreover alcoholic and non alcoholic is generally a hard line separation so children and whatnot don’t have any real reason to be around there.

Sure, this is adjudicated though there’s absolutely zero question to it at this point.

No one said they did.

Correct, the jury instructions are public and literally all of that is in it.

I’m not even quite sure what your point is.