Those generations are common like that at least in Germany too. It’s not as specific as you think. And even if it was then it’s made up regardless so who cares. It’s a useful concept.

This was it

Nah just use Unix time

REDE

I fucking love this picture

I love that app so much. My Amseln and Kohlmeisen are so sweet.

Anarcho capitalists freecities are a horrible idea. Wont take long before you can buy people in there, because the only rule is the golden rule.

I am grateful everyday that cars cannot fly.

Plants on buildings bring some architectural and safety challenges, depending on how large they are. You need to somehow get dirt and water up, and the dirt can be pretty heavy. If something falls down into the ground it could hit someone and injured them. And also, with time, roots could lessen the structural integrity of a building.

It has nothing to do with that. This is about privacy and data security.

I don’t get it

(Pie)feds

Rust is a tiny bit slower in benchmarks with similar implementations, since it has a few more runtime checks, but the difference is minor.

There are dozens of us?

Woof? Spricht der Hund angelsächsisch oder was?

Technik ist schon cool, Kommerz (und Merz) nicht

That’s still insignificant compensation

I’ve heard that before, but isn’t this easily defended by the fact that people who listen to the same song over and over again exist?

I can listen to Ado music over and over, it gets better every time. So then there is familiarity and predictability (since I know that piece of music rather well by then).

Musk ist so ne Arschgeige man, Drecksdepp

I understand some of the hype. LLMs are pretty amazing nowadays (though closedai is unethical af so don’t use them).

I need to program complex cryptography code for university. Claude sonnet 3.5 solves some of the challenges instantly.

And it’s not trivial stuff, but things like “how do I divide polynomials, where each coefficient of that polynomial is an element of GF(2^128).” Given the context (my source code), it adds it seamlessly, writes unit tests, and it just works. (That is important for AES-GCM, the thing TLS relies on most of the time .)

Besides that, LLMs are good at what I call moving words around. Writing cute little short stories in fictional worlds given some info material, or checking for spelling, or re-formulating a message into a very diplomatic nice message, so on.

On the other side, it’s often complete BS shoehorning LLMs into things, because “AI cool word line go up”.