

I am so, so ready for ICE to seriously piss off veteran groups.
If you’ve served in Iraq or Afghanistan and you had missions to suppress violent insurgents… you implicitly know how to conduct a violent insurgency, should push come to shove.
I am so, so ready for ICE to seriously piss off veteran groups.
If you’ve served in Iraq or Afghanistan and you had missions to suppress violent insurgents… you implicitly know how to conduct a violent insurgency, should push come to shove.
Ok well this deserves a closer look. Might slap this on a spare laptop and give it a test drive.
And of course, wartime presidents can have a third term.
Uh, no. There is no carve out or exception for that.
Then again, the tribunal of six will probably just be like “lol sure go ahead” if he does it and it’s challenged in court
K
Then Russian troops in Ukraine would be legitimate targets for western troops
Your move
The problem of course is that it’s impossible for the target country to tell what flavor (kinetic, conventional, tactical nuke, strategic nuke) the warhead is until it impacts. And thus standard strategic ICBM doctrine for anyone who has ICBMs and/or SLBMs is “assume it’s the biggest nuke”, which of course triggers second-strike doctrine (“you launched on me, so I’m going to fucking glass your whole country”).
Kinda want to send this to my company lol
Not funny as in “ha ha”
Switch to BSD
So just to be clear:
It’d be really funny if Disney instated vaccination mandates for visiting their properties in Florida
Honestly, if we had known that all you need to do to bribe an SC justice was to give them a fucking RV and consistently refer to it as a “gratuity”, we could have gotten in front of a whole fucking lot of the problems we’re facing now
I love winter, and I love walking around when the city lights are on. It is aesthetically pleasing to me. I also constantly wear sunglasses on bright days. So yeah; I don’t mind limited daytime hours at all.
Holy fuck. That’s one hell of a mask-off moment. And it shows in the astounded reactions of the interviewer in the transcript.
It genuinely baffles me when groups make appeals to the morals of immoral people. Like, honestly, what the actual fuck do you expect will happen? Do you think there’s gonna be any reaction outside of “he’s going to laugh at you and then ignore you”?
Brb booting into WednesdayOS
Tribunal of Six:
Because it’s pretty much all public knowledge. There’s nothing novel there. It’s very obviously a distraction and obfuscation tactic.
It’s a tactic commonly used as a defense strategy by corporate attorneys, especially when defending against private parties: you simply inundate the opposing side with reams of borderline irrelevant bullshit. Makes it substantially harder to find pertinent documents, and also serves to delay the discovery that maybe something important was left out.
Case in point:
Find a recently-ish manufactured used Chromebook/chromebox, and try to unlock the BIOS so you can slap a different OS on it
Source: it me 🫠
Put this one in the Louvre