I guess man, I’m just trying to offer alternatives. We travel enough that we like knowing what we’re gonna get instead of having to worry if we’re going to be the next horror story. The airbnb app makes a point now of assuring you that the price you see is all-inclusive of fees - now why would they do that, I wonder. Ultimately, we’re probably some of the tidiest travelers. We just don’t have time to worry about rules changing at each place depending on how badly the host wants to pocket that cleaning fee

After chores, cleaning fees, and non-refundable deposits, is it really though?

What you’re looking for is anything labeled a “suite”. I prefer to stay in those whenever possible, and generally use Staybridge, but there’s other options out there

Still a long way until the end of November…

Appx and UWP are more packaging (like rpm, deb, msi) formats than an executable format. PE is behind everything in windows and the amount of effort required to change that seems truly Herculean, even for an organization the size of Microsoft. Heck, even executables for windows ARM were PE (as well as UEFI binaries). But even if you assume that they do go forward with something that insane, if they want developers to write software for it, they’ll have to publish the format specs so that gcc and llvm can implement them so that the tens of thousands of existing libraries could be ported

Yeah but given that dxvk is a thing, a switch to dx13 would just need to be implemented there. The underlying wine layer would only need to change if the PE format changed. But even then, that would destroy backwards compatibility in the windows world… something that Microsoft’s enterprise customers would (rightfully) crucify them for.

Sab might have its own mask settings - it would be worth looking at. Same thing applies here - subtract the mask part from 7 to get the real permissions. In this case, mask 002 translates into 775. This gives the uid and gid that the container is running under (probably defined in a variable somewhere) Read/Write/Execute, but anyone else Read/Execute. The “anyone else” would just be any account on the system (regardless of access method) that didn’t match on the actual uid or gid value.

For what it’s worth, Ikea’s LACK tables make great mini racks

Could be that lidarr is setting its own permissions for downloaded stuff (look for something like dmask or fmask in the docker config). You might also need to chmod -R so it hits all sub folders. If you have a file or directory mask option, remember that they’re inverse, so instead of 777, you’d do 000 for rwxrwxrwx.

Oh for sure, I should have clarified that I was really speaking to the products that already have a US-based manufacturing presence and already have to compete with imports. Ramping up domestic production on things that aren’t already manufactured here because of the demented ramblings of a guy who (ostensibly) won’t be around in 4 years is just asking for your business to go under

I saw it explained best like this

Current imported price: $30

Current locally made price: $35

New imported price: $70

New locally made price: $69.99

Absolute most underrated comment in this thread

I’ll toss in Empire Records - the store set, the costumes, the music, the actors, the meandering listlessness… all scream “this is a 90’s movie about the 90’s”. Plus the whole Rex Manning plot is absolutely what happened to so many 70’s and 80’s artists. Not perfect by any means, but a great encapsulation of the decade.

You wildly underestimate most corporate IT security’s obsession with pushing updates to products like this as soon as they release. They also often have the power to make such nonsense the law of the land, regardless of what best practices dictate. Maybe this incident will shed some light on how bad of an idea auto updates are and get C-levels to do something about it, but even if they do, it’ll only last until the next time someone gets compromised by a flaw that was fixed in a dot-release