Not selfhosting AND privacy.
From the sidebar of this lemmy:
“A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.”
So its about self-hosting with certain qualities (not giving up privacy or lockin). Not about privacy in general.
Signal isnt selfhosted and does lock you in, albeit with a high reputation to not become evil.
Better lemmy would be https://lemmy.ml/c/privacy
Nothing to do with selfhosting
Naming things is hard. But if you have a better category name to distinguish from classic cms software I am all ears.
And yes no-code software itself is written with code.
But I dont mind having a name for software in which
I just see those foundation onboard / leaves from afar … but isnt the retention rate way to high to do actual foundational stuff?
I am dutch and spend many an hour at the intersection of IT and Privacy … but this is the wrong community to advertise a local Signal group.
Also if its for business, anyone signing up agrees with a data-processing-agreement (which I dont known if thats the case here) but normally they promise not to use PII for other services then the one provided.
It would take analysis of that DPA if thats the case or not.
Also not possible with developer options on, USB to PC, ADB or Universal Debloater? https://github.com/0x192/universal-android-debloater
Why do you crosspost this all over the place?
Clock Phone Contacts Gallery etc … Fossify suite!
Another scenario would be all universities cooperate in one instance, like Surf does for all Dutch universities and colleges for vocational training.
All in all my conclusion after experiencing the same: Samsung wants to replicate the same level of surveilance Google has. So with a Samsung phone I need to degoogle AND to desamsung …
In that case … you could install StreetComplete without concern.
Impressive and allaround cool!
I am just gonna use “philosofical” project for a lot of other initiatives in the future …
deleted by creator
I am just gonna use “philosofical” project for a lot of other initiatives in the future …
Anybody know if messengers fall within this definition?
Only thing I claimed was you missed the point of SomeAmateur, meaning one can understand global supply chain AND worry about depending on foreign entities using it in geo-politics, so mentioning counter measures (make some stuff ourselves for a change) is reasonable. I am wrong all the time by the way, I just adress a lot more in my comments which you choose to ignore. But alas, you are free to pick and choose just like everybody else.
We as a species make up terms on a daily basis, so I feel the liberty to do the same. Glad it doesnt give any results because it indicates original thought.
If large parts of the supply chain consist of suppliers (vendors) on the other side of the earth, one can focus on one vendor lock-in or one by one (for analytical purposes) and optimise for that but often the bigger picture of a complex supply chain is missed.
Hence the aggregated lock-in.
But to avoid futher confusion maybe supply-chain lock-in is a better term and yields searchs results.
You asked why and I gave an explanation where the 27 downvotes came from. So I think there is some agreement within this lemmy about being offtopic.
If that bothers you too much I suggest focusing on something more productive, as I will do.