Ahhh I see, I was confused about what you were getting at. My mistake. And yes that’s very true…hmm. More dire than I was even thinking then…
Honestly this is exactly the kind of thing that taxes and governments are supposed to be good for handling. Failures within failures I suppose!
Yes, it does apply to every operating system - hence, the differentiator becomes whether the operating system has hundreds of millions of dollars to spend on dedicated security development. This is why a lot of companies now don’t even let you use Android devices for BYOD aside from Google or Samsung, because they’re the only companies with the resources to keep their security really up to date.
Yeah honestly, while I do think that part of the issue with Linux popularity is that it doesn’t have some big corporate marketing sponsor, I truly believe that the bigger part of it is just the absolute roughness of the user experience and the still dominant mentality of wanting it to be some kind of prestige flex club. Linux needs to become as brain dead simple and out of the box usable as iOS or Windows. Linux folks love to say that it already is. It isn’t. I use Linux, and I really like it. But if you think it’s as straightforward as the big two, you’re lost in the sauce. You’re like the math professor who says “Come on guys double integrals are NOT that complicated, it’s basically just addition and multiplication. Don’t you know how to add and multiply?”
The big problem is that the intersection of people who are not lost in the sauce and who want to and are capable of actively making contributions to Linux, is very very small.
I respect where you’re coming from, But the mentality of Linux users to say “skill issue” in these situations is the #1 reason why Linux isn’t more adopted. Is it a skill issue on the user’s end or is it a skill issue on the Linux developers’ end? Maybe they should make more automatically functional out of the box software. Doesn’t feel too nice to be told that does it?
Not everyone has time to become skilled in computing. Additionally, Linux users are so deep in the computing rabbit hole that they don’t even appreciate how deep in it they really are. What strikes them as basic or fundamental is really confusing for a lot of people.
It is not acceptable to just blame the user and say that the problem is that the user is a fool. That could maybe be a reasonable standpoint if 99% of people were using the software without issue, but we all know that isn’t the case with Linux.
Someone wants to boot up their computer and get on Wi-Fi and play games with their updated drivers. Windows provides that out of the box, without them needing to do anything. That is factually a better experience than needing to screw around reading a bunch of guides and forums and running commands that you don’t understand for potentially multiple hours. Blaming that on the user just means that the users continue to have a bad experience. If that’s the view the community wants to take, fine - But then don’t complain when the majority of people don’t want to use your thing.
I think the big problem with this, as far as I know, is that this code needs pretty rapid security updates that require a fairly huge and experienced team of people to both find, understand and implement the security changes. Otherwise it becomes very insecure very quickly. So yeah we can always use 2019 Android, etc. But it would just put you at a huge security risk.
Yeah lol I love the sentiment of this meme but the understanding of, and I don’t even want to call it economics… The understanding of the fundamental nature of scarcity, and human cooperation and collaboration, that this displays…is disappointing.
We could make the same meme about any organized exchange of human energy, even without any money.
"I spend 10 hours harvesting potatoes.
I give my neighbor the potatoes, saving him ten hours of work.
My neighbor uses his extra 10 hours to fix my roof."
This is just like…the literal nature of reality. Energy is transferred between different subsystems within a system, according to how much the subsystem is capable of demanding or receiving energy. This could be funnier if all the companies were owned by one larger company, but even then it wouldn’t be a particularly deep insight. That would be the same sort of thing as a family member gifting you $100 for your birthday and then you gift them $100 for their birthday later in the year. At the very first glance it seems circular and pointless, until you realize that you’re basically temporarily allocating additional resources to someone for them to use for a certain amount of time, and then reallocating them to someone else at a later point when you no longer need that surplus.
It’s actually quite reasonable as a principle. The fact that the particular instantiation of this principle in the case of AI technology may be fruitless and not socially beneficial is NOT an essential flaw of the principle but rather an incidental flaw in the principle’s actualization in this particular case.
A deep insight indeed. I often think that paradoxically, people’s feelings would be better off without others trying to preemptively take care of those feelings. Of course, there is a balance.
I know this is really serious but the title makes it sound like they’re some kind of invading alien army approaching from the ocean, and every day they draw closer
I opened this article thinking it was gonna be something cool about space travel 🥲
Phase 1 is nearing completion!
Now come to think of it, couldn’t any website have dangerous scary material for kids? In fact, really the whole Internet could! In fact!!! Oh my gosh! Even your house could have really scary bad things for kids in it conceivably. I suppose we will have to put ID badge readers on everyone’s front doors now. And cameras of course. We should probably even put cameras in the children’s bathrooms to make sure nothing bad is happening to them in there.
My very rough very compressed minimal definition is something like:
“Ability to distinguish truths from falsehoods within the confines of available information”
Probably true, but I don’t think that warrants the stupidity being put in scare quotes like that. Regardless of whether it is intrinsic or extrinsic stupidity, stupidity by nature or by nurture, the result is genuine stupidity all the same
But people are talking about it on Twitter, and what happens on Twitter is more real than reality itself!
If we’re lucky they’ll do something that speaks to the youth, like doing Tiktok dances in protest
So does anyone know what actually comes of this? Does this realistically change the trajectory at all or will Israel just carry on like nothing changed?
Yeah same although I’m now concerned about that ending up on my Palantir profile. Isn’t it great that that’s actually a fairly legitimate concern nowadays?
What an incredibly stupid lie. Like Epstein was the Santa Claus of raping children, he somehow managed to get into all those houses all by himself in just one night!
Senators: You are doing something very bad
Bezos: No
Senators: Yes
Bezos: What are you gonna do about it?
Senators: …
This concludes today’s session
This is one of the most flagrant and reprehensible environmental crimes in quite awhile. What will come of it? And because it’s not in my state, there’s not much I can do to make it worse for them. I expect a small fine and business as usual.