🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕠𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖

I’m not American I’m enjoying my freedom over here in Australia. Just warning you that this isn’t the game u wanna be playing considering ur opponent has more guns and more military service.

45% of republicans own guns, 20% of democrats own guns. 63% of veterans are republicans 35% of veterans are democrats I don’t like ur odds.

So u are justifying violence for speech. Depends on your definition of violence. Calling for death that’s a problem hurting someone else’s feelings completely fine.

Don’t worry u have already done the justifying for me. I’m so glad u support my plan to improve society.

I will engage with that question the second you engage with mine in good faith.

Saying violence for people exercising free speech is wrong gets right wing nut tag? I would say justifying murder for people exercising speech is fascist activity but what would I know?

You justify violence for speech the real fascists use it to kill you. Think before you do your enemies work for them.

You really do seem like a joyous person. I would advise against justifying violence in response to speech. The right supports him, the right owns most of the guns, the right make up most of the military, you may justify violence in response to speech but you won’t win.

I’d recommend starting with this comment section.

The right supports him. The right owns a majority of guns. I would advise against justifying political violence cos you won’t win.

No not what I said at all. Violence in response to speech is what I said. I would recommend working on your comprehension skills.

I think he would be a little more respectful than that. Plus u missed my point what do u think the right (who own a majority of guns) are going to do in response?

Fancy way of justifying violence against speech. You are the problem.

Violence in response to speech is not a good thing for a liberal society. If one side of politics does it the other will be forced to respond on the same level.

That’s not what they actually do. They simply introduce a barrier that’s cheap for a human to complete but expensive for a computer to beat. A captcha is about $1 per million to serve and to complete one is about $1.1 per million.

Pixel then put GrapheneOS on it

Open whisper protocol works with a federated networks in fact its more anonymous cos if u have only one server u can collate senders and receiver’s to build a social graph. Their is quite a bit of sus shit related to signal they don’t like 3rd party clients, they have mandatory phone number requirements (despite that being their most significant cost), they received money from inqtel the CIA venture capital fund.

I don’t see what security advantage u get from a single vendor ecosystem. I see a lot a reasons it can be abused tho.

I used to have this. Then I realised how surveillancy it was and got a dumb watch. I now get my weekly spending budge out in cash and pay with that. Turns out u spend less when ur paying cash.

The us has always been anti illegal immigration and accepting of legal immigration. Its incredibly harmful that the 2 concepts are being combined and treated the same now.

I didn’t realise jkr meant that interpretation but its definitely something to consider.

I’ve always believed one must separate art from the artist lest all works are reduced to nothing given enough time. People love to dismiss modern works based on the authors opinions yet everyone through history is bad by modern standards. We must judge people by the context of their time. For example both Churchill and Disney where famously antisemitic yet both are now praised for their efforts against the Nazis.

Haven’t read any Marcus Aurelius I’m reading Plato at the moment so I’ll add it to the list.