All of his books are just wonderful.

If this was real they’d definitely say 0 fat, 0 sodium, 0 sugar. Companies are allowed to round down under a certain amount un the US

Kagi at the moment. Just feels right to pay for incredibly useful services with money instead of privacy

By default just did a video (piped link) on this and I 100% agree with him. The killer feature is simplelogin. Being able to use a different alias email for every single account I use is absolutely amazing.

I think that’s great! I would talk to anyone who was genuinely interested 😊.

I don’t volunteer either piece of information, but sooner or later someone is going to overhear me ordering vegan food or see me opening my lunch and the dreaded conversation will have to happen. I wish people would just let me make my own food choices in private without making a big thing about it.

deleted by creator

It’s probably not for marketing emails. They probably require login to disable account alerts. Imagine a threat actor gets access to your account, turns off transaction alerts so you aren’t notified, then transfers out all your crypto.

I’m certain the marketing emails don’t require login to unsubscribe.

It’s probably not for marketing emails. They probably require login to disable account alerts. Imagine a threat actor gets access to your account, turns of transaction alerts so you aren’t notified, then transfers out all your crypto.

I’m certain the marketing emails don’t require login to unsubscribe.

Probably an unpopular opinion - but I actually think requesting overriding 2fa is a big deal and companies shouldn’t do that lightly. If I had a lot of money in crypto I would sure hope the exchange would scrutinize a request to turn off 2fa. And if op had saved their backup words they wouldn’t have been in this situation.

Now requiring that to change an email subscription is not great, but again - turning off 2fa without the proper backup options should be difficult and scrutinized.

Not really. I disable camera access to most apps on my phone and in general I trust that. Never felt the need for a physical shutter.

I think if I was in an environment where I used my devices within eyeshot of others frequently I’d probably think about a privacy screen protector, but I typically have private places I can use my phone for sensitive things so I just try to be cognizant of my surroundings to prevent shoulder surfing

All depends on the threats you’re concerned about I guess

Depends. They might have a proxy in the network config or DNS or any number of non-network based methods of logging and tracking.