• SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s the reason I wrote what I wrote. everyone only knows what they need to know. How do you think a third entity would identify you?

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Easy:

      • companies have a vested interest in identifying you (ads, data brokers, etc)
      • governments have a vested interest in tracking you (local police, terrorism tracking, etc)

      I don’t trust the government and private interests to come to an agreement that somehow benefits citizens more than their combined interests.

      • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m not saying I’m for age verification. I’m just saying if it were for it, there’d be solutions.

        What I wrote I did while being barely awake in five minutes. Sure it needs work. But there’d be ways to do it without a camera up your butt.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          My point is that any solution here will be used for tracking, because that’s in the interests of both regulators and regulated entities. It’s not going to solve the original problem because kids are great at finding workarounds, and it will cause harm to those who follow the rules.

          I also could devise a technical solution here that respects users’ privacy and is effective, but once it’s implemented, it will be changed to violate privacy. That’s how these things work.