• bonenode@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    9 days ago

    He just has to adopt the shittiest views possible. So predictable. Must be his kink or something.

    • oneser@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s a similar tactic to Trump that being permanently seen and heard is more important than any of the content.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        Curious your comment was minimized under “more comments.”

        That is the way these far right operate, they are loud, bombastic, aggressive. They get attacked but because everyone knows how fucked our system is right now, they appear to be fighting the system.

        They are fighting to make it worse, the way to stop them would be to offer popular reform honestly. But alas that is more dreaded amongst our “left” parties than the right winning, or fascists.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s how he reaches out to the dumbest members of society and maintains some kind of support.

      Same tactic Trump uses.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The only words I want to hear from Farage are **Charlie ** Kirk’s final words. “Oghrg. Gurgle. Ahhh.”

      Edit for clarity.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        For a moment I thought you meant Captain Kirk, and wondered when in Generations did he say that.

  • -RJ-@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    9 days ago

    Why was Farage at a World Leader conference? He doesn’t run any countries? Just another excuse to not be in his constituency I guess.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s not a world leader conference, it’s a meeting of assholes, grifters and criminals, and some of them are also world leaders

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 days ago

          I wasn’t trying to rank them

          There must be 1000s of people that lead a state that aren’t there (given ~200 countries). What makes this guy’s presence so special? Or, perhaps, his presence is also out of place

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            9 days ago

            California is 2/3 the size of the UK.

            Farage is an MP of a constituency of 75 thousand, and won the election for that position with 21225 votes. He’s not a minister, he’s not an appointed leader of anything, he’s not even the leader (or any official part) of the official opposition in the UK parliament. Hell he’s not even doing a passable job at being an MP given he’s missed like, 70+% of parliamentary meetings, and hasn’t held any significant surgeries in his constituency either. He’s the literal definition of paid for doing nothing politician, shuffling around Fasc-a-Lago hoping to earn some favours by having his nose so far up Trump’s ass he could diagnose the tangerine tyrant’s appendix…

              • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                8 days ago

                Drop in session/office hours type deal for constituents. Our mps can help citizens (usually by writing strongly worded letters) with small civil matters like planning/building regulations, issues with county council (local government) and so on. It’s also an opportunity for people to lobby their mp about national concerns too.

            • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              California is 2/3 the size of the UK.

              In population, that’s true.

              In terms of GDP, California’s is a bit over $4 trillion, while the UK’s is $3.6 trillion. And in land area, California is 1.6 times larger than the UK.

              • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                Yeah, my pedantic unnecessary retort was going to point out the GDP thing but then note that there’s some interesting commentary around saying “size” when five Canadian provinces are larger. But mostly that was me still being annoyed at the Davos soundbites

              • fonix232@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Well, politicians are supposed to represent their electorate, which happens to be people, not land, or profits.

                Though given the recent years’ heavily publicised American approach to elections, I’m surprised you guys haven’t made the change to “land votes” or “money votes”, given the former seems to be what most of Americans believe to be true (especially when looking at election maps), plus the latter seems to be true anyway…

            • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              My grammar is admittedly pretty farm boy, so I thought I’d check. This might be saying the sentence was fine. But either way what your suggesting is nothing like how I hear people speak

              Some authorities prescribe that restrictive relative clauses (where the relative clause is part of the identification of the noun phrase) should only use that as the introductory pronoun, and non-restrictive relative clauses should only use which or who/whom as the introductory pronoun. In practice, either pronoun is commonly used to introduce a restrictive relative clause, including in edited prose. In contrast, it is not usual in edited written English to use that to introduce a non-restrictive relative clause, though there are occasional rare attestations.

              https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/that

              I saw at least one typo there and figured I’d leave it for you

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          That’s pretty funny. Both that I didn’t get his name right (I’ll put it down to him being irritating in a way I block things out); and that I got three comments effectively pointing out that California has a GDP higher than most countries without pointing out the name was wrong.

    • bollybing@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Farage owns the Reform Party. The leader of Reform in Wales just got a 10+ year prison sentence for taking Russian bribes to promote Russian agendas. Nigel often speaks favourably of Russia and Putin and regularly made paid appearances on Russian television before sanctions made that impossible.

      It seems highly likely that Farage has also been well paid by Russia for his lifes work of disrupting UK-European relations.

  • Renat@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 days ago

    N**el Farage is responsible for Brexit. UK would be better place if he withdrew from politics.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      8 days ago

      Farage is responsible? I heard it was a national referendum and the vast majority of votes were for Brexit. British are as bad as “I have no idea who voted Trump” Americans.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 days ago

        vast majority of votes

        Pfffttt… 51.8% and as if it wasnt a bunch of old assholes who saw a bus and didnt think it would impact their holiday to complain about not being able to retire to Spain immediately after.

        We don’t all have to talk like we know everything all the time.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        the vast majority of votes were for Brexit

        It was 52% to 48 on low turnout. Real fucking landslide. And much of the funding came from Arron Banks, who went to Russia as a young man and came back with a fortune, the origin of which he has never convincingly explained.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          And who’s fault is the low turnout?

          You guys always whinge and then vote stupid, then blame the politicians.

      • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Where would the blame lie? The idiots who believed the lies or the cunt with the megaphone spreading them?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        British are as bad as “I have no idea who voted Trump” Americans.

        Hard truths. New Labour only ever knows how to run to the right of the opposition and the old Conservatives can’t campaign their way out of a paper bag. So it’s Reform UK in the next election, strictly due to liberal incompetence.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Shows what you know.

        Seriously you might want to look it up because majority does not mean 51% of those who bother to turn out. Which was mostly no one because it was seen as a political performance piece and not a real idea.

        Then the idiot government screwed it up further by running headlong into a brick wall with zero plan. It was always going to be bad but they could have managed the split better.