• termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Besides the privacy implications : trying to protect children from grooming by forbidding specific apps, is like trying to treat chickenpox with concealer.

    The real problem is that our society is even producing people who would groom a child.

    But as always, politicians will try to “prevent” crime at the latest possible point in the action chain, instead of going back to the source.

    I dont want to understate the fact that going to the source is extremely hard to do in many cases ; but maybe people would be less disinterested in politics, if we were actually choosing between different treatments - instead of different brands of concealer - to treat our various collective cases of chicken pox.

  • Engywook@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just a question from my ignorance: but is this really enforceable, outside of mainstream apps/services? What happens if someone creates a custom app relying on a custom sever and uses it only among few trusted people?

    • HelloRoot@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      mainstream

      is the keyword here. Mainstream is really big.

      They come for the lions share first. You do nothing because you think you’re unaffected. Then later they will come for you. And nobody will do anything for you either.

      Of course, professional criminals like yourself (sarcasm) will find a way to escape the law. But I doubt it’s nice to live on the edge of society like that anyway, being unable to interact with most services.

      • Engywook@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, criminals are smarter than politicians anyway. And far more knowledge, with respect to technology.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just an example: Of course you can use a private email service. You don’t need to give a copy of all your communications to Google Mail or outlook. Or medical data.

        But what helps that, if 97% of the people you communicate with (including your doctor) use outlook or gmail, and all messages you write them are kindly stored there “for them”?

    • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      For the moment, that would not be enforceable in respect to people with technical knowledge. Enforcing it would require authoritarian control and even China’s Great Firewall has way to circumvent it.

      On the other hand, this is already far more difficult than you might think. You could not install such an app from a server authenticated with TLS because the TLS keys might be subverted - the certification chain has national institutions as the top certificate authorities. You would also not be able to install such an app on an Android phone because Google has decided it needs developer attestation to install apps in a way accesible to end users. You can run Linux now but if all that is taken seriously, your options to run Linux might become limited. E.g. you already can’t run many banking apps on phones with user-controlled OS software. Railway apps like the German one already don’t work. In future, you might not even be able to use a municipial library’s or bookstore’s website this way.

      But more to the point, the real application case for this kind of civil rights is not some nerd kids which want to play DnD or minecraft on their own server or test their self-written IRC service. The real application case is what we see in the US, people being dragged out of their house and disappearing just because of their ancestry, how they look, being poor or the area they live in. They don’t have time to compile software or configure port-knocking protocols.

      Somebody has called these systems of “democratic” mass surveillance uncovered by Snowden “Turnkey Dictatorship” . I for sure wish they would have been wrong.

    • bruce965@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well… I assume that might be illegal. Or maybe these rules would only apply to public software? For sure it wouldn’t be enforceable, and it would still allow criminals to use it to communicate privately between each other, but it would make it harder to exploit mainstream public apps (e.g.: WhatsApp) to scam or exploit weaker individuals.

  • olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Question for a the Fight Chat Control website: My country’s primary language is not English, do I need to translate the e-mail?

    • falcunculus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes you should, and it would be even better to use it as a template to write it yourself.

      MEPs will pay more attention to messages that seem genuine and from their voters rather than mass-produced by foreigners.

  • mub@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “outlaws anonymous communication” - This sends chills down me more than anything else I can remember. The people and organisations that benefit from this can’t be trusted.

    The only thing this does is control the law abiding public. Criminals are already breaking the law, and won’t care. It is trivial to build an anonymous communication app. There will always be a workaround.

    Anonymity, and free speak should be human rights.

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wasn’t banishing anonymous communication literally what the bad guys in Mirror’s Edge did? And facilitating that anonymous communication was literally the entire livelihood of the protagonist’s faction?

    • zaperberry@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Outlaws anonymous communication by requiring every citizen to verify their age…

      To me that reads similarly to age restricted websites asking you to verify your age before accessing it, where you just input a date that says you’re old enough and then you’re set. I’ve been 99 years old for the last decade. Given what they’re trying to do, I wouldn’t be surprised if they use more extensive verification measures, but I haven’t read into that yet. If it’s just an age/DOB input, then it’s not really outlawing anything.

      • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except those same websites are now being forced to verify age using photos or government ID which will definitely be required in this case as well

    • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      because when you have fourteen parties there’s bound to be at least a few fascists hiding behind the curtains. the real problem is that there’s not legislation that prevents this dude from retracting and resubmitting it when it looks like it’s gonna fail

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because Denmark holds the rotating EU presidency, Denmark is literally required by treaty to work towards compromise when the council cannot agree. If it wasn’t Denmark doing this work, it would be another country holding the EU presidency doing it.

      It’s not really about Denmark - it’s about the entire council agreeing with a compromise the presidency has to seek.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Still can’t fucking believe Denmark, my country, supports this. Yeah, it got revised thanks to Denmark, but it shouldn’t be revised, it should be killed.

    • Obin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Denmark not only supports it, it’s the one country that pushes the hardest for it, and did from the start. Which seems weird from my German perspective, because I wouldn’t exactly associate Denmark with a police-state, quite the opposite actually, especially compared to Germany.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        the europeans on lemmy continue to insist that americans are ahead of the fascism game; but we still don’t have chat control and have only elected one fascist so far. lol

        • SaneMartigan@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Mate, USA is way ahead in fascism. EU isn’t openly disappear / deporting people yet. EU has healthcare, mostly.

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Pretty sure fascist already broke off the UK. While I will agree the US is ahead, it is everywhere already.

            This is a worldwide problem unfortunately.

            • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              This is the moment when “Socialism or Barbarity” is decided. We can either organize, and throw off the chains of capitalism, or we can succumb to the fascist order that the owning class wants.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            try saying that you support palestine action publicly in the uk. lol

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          While we have problems here in Europe and they’re concerning, the US really has this shit on a whole 'nother level. The NSA more or less has ALL the data that enters or exits the country and probably most of what goes around public networks (so just about any ISP) within the country. Your Lemmy instance is hosted in France and from your comment I infer that you’re American (so likely situated in the US), so most likely the communication between you and the instance is all recorded and stored at 33 Thomas Street. They’re just storing everything so they can decrypt it if quantum computing breaks existing algorithms. Then there’s all the tooling the CIA and NSA have built to spy on everyone who has any even somewhat insecure smart device.

          Denmark is trying to legislate all this into happening, the US just ignores legislation when something actually disagrees with their spying

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Barring civilians from using encryption and software deemed dangerous is a new level imo. These are the tools we have to fight this stuff, maintaining those rights is a big deal.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Oh I agree. If encryption becomes illegal I may actually move to another freaking continent. I have nothing to hide, but I am still not willing to compromise on privacy and security.

        • this@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Only one? Do all if the bootlickers in the house and the senate, as well as JD vance not count?

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You absolutely are ahead of the fascist game, so far ahead that your billionaires are funding European fascists and emboldening them.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            our billionaires are also funding the protests again them; one of the walmart heirs is entire responsible for the noking protests.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Name one world leader except Trump that can make the stock market crash by speaking… :)

          We dont have any big leaders in Europe that most people know by name even.

          Its all talk about Trump, Musk, Zuckerberg over here too. Like mini America. There is nobody here who is saying anything people care about. We dont even know their names.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            We dont even know their names.

            that’s surprising to learn since the likes of farage, le pen have & hocke heavily influencing politics in the uk, france & germinay and meloni winning her election in italy.

  • Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ok, the website says that Germany already opposes it. Is that outdated or what? I don’t want to spam MEPs if they already agree with me.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Spam them regardless. You want them to stay where they are and to argue firmly. Especially coming from Germany when talking about the evil of the surveillance state.

  • [migrated to PieFed]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t get it. If an email was encrypted with PGP between a friend and myself, how would anyone else without the private keys be able to decrypt it?

    • Kjell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They can’t, but that is not the purpose. If the chat control passes then all big services will be forced to leave EU or build in a backdoor. That will give them control over more than 90 % of the population and satisfies their goal. You and your friends are a rounding error. And if you would perform a crime, or are suspected of one, they can use the fact that you encrypt your messages against you.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was against it until I realized they would also ban minors from Roblox.

    That’s kind of weird, but it would be awesome to invade the now empty lego game, filled with only adults…

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      As a parent, I ban my own kids from Roblox. Because it’s my job to protect my own children, not the government’s job to treat everyone like children. This policy would put my children in more danger because they’ll need free speech once they’re adults.

      • mub@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is one of the many reasons that prohibition doesn’t work. Anything prohibited gets pushed underground and criminalised, but can’t be stopped. The best option, like with drugs, is to decriminalise and educate. Teach kids so they “know” before they become adults, otherwise dangerous stuff is a surprise waiting to burn kids when they turn 18.

  • lascapi@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That’s not a surprise, but that’s sad!!

    Let’s continue to fight against!!!